Pulp Fiction Proves That it’s Impossible to Separate an Artwork From its Sponser

Pulp Fiction Proves That it’s Impossible to Separate an Artwork From its Sponser

Pulp Fiction will celebrate its 25-year anniversary next year (it was released in 1994). When it came out, everybody applauded the picture as a work of art. The critics told us that they were lucky to witness the movie, fortunate to be alive in that time and place.

However, the Major quickly identified a demonic force at work in Pulp Fiction. I subconsciously knew that a Satanic person was behind the picture, and that his goal was the spiritual destruction of America. As it turns out, I was right!

Let me illustrate with pictures:

1.) Harvey Weinstein produced (sponsored) Pulp Fiction.

Harvey-Weinstein

2.) He “green-lighted” this disturbing scene: sexual torture and kidnapping.

gimp

3.) And he gave a thumb’s-up for this scene as well: mixing violence with humor.

famous scene

Of course, he got a fellow sadist to do the heavy lifting: i.e. Quentin Tarantino. Let’s be honest: perhaps the only person that’s more tortured than Harvey Weinstein is Quentin Tarantino. Everything from that traitor is about violence, torture and sadism. And he mixes in some clever dialog to fool the lemmings in the crowd. Meanwhile, the seditious “critic” applauds the effort, silently grinning as our cultural traditions are flushed into the toilets of degeneracy.

Has the Weinstein/Tarantino connection ever made something that inspires humanity? Can they capture the passionate wellspring of spiritual love, or of childlike innocence? They know nothing about that! Everything they make is saturated with a degenarate vision of humanity…a vision that must inevitably spring from the consciousness of its creator.

What kind of men would find humor in torturing the innocent? What kind of degenerates find it acceptable to feed these images into the minds of a nation?

Summary: It’s impossible to separate a piece of art from the artist. When the mind of an individual is layered in filth, then that’s what he’ll produce. When his subconscious goal is cultural subterfuge, then that’s what his art will portray.

Only a noble mind can create a noble art! And only a lofty soul can make an artwork that speaks to humanity.

See Related Article: Movie Review: Colao

 

The Eye of the Employer is Often Worth More than the Hands of a Dozen Employees.

The Eye of the Employer is Often Worth More than the Hands of a Dozen Employees.

These are the wise words of PT Barnum in his book, The Art of Getting Money:

DEPEND UPON YOUR OWN PERSONAL EXERTIONS. The eye of the employer is often worth more than the hands of a dozen employees. In the nature of things, an agent cannot be so faithful to his employer as to himself.

Very true.

The wise employer is overlooking his business. He’s like a parent, observing his child on the playground. He watches with astute wisdom from afar. He takes note of every incident, every moment. And when his child is about to make a mistake, then the parent intercedes.

So it is with a business owner. The minute he goes away, his fortunes begin to fail. For the employee has no real stake in the affair. So while the boss is in Punta Cana, the employee is speaking with a flippancy to the customer. While the boss is in Dubai, the employee is leaving a mess on the counter top.

The eye of an employer is what rules over a business.

See Related Article: The Barter System Was Flawed

 

Great Music Should Communicate a Universal Life Essense

Great Music Should Communicate a Universal Life Essense

What makes a piece of music legendary? To quote Richard Wagner, it’s a “universal life essence.” It contains a spirit that saturates the air waves. Great music is a democratic lightning bolt…it reaches into the heart of all men, regardless of their race.

Note: A man can only write a heroic symphony is if he is a hero himself. You cannot separate the GREAT MAN from a GREAT WORK!

By way of example…

Beethoven is beloved in Europe, Asia and Africa. His time and place is irrelevant…for the music is created inside the mind of a genius: a man that worked in a majestic spirit world. In the modern era, we see a similar quality in the music of Elvis Presley or James Brown. The energy is bursting forth in a wave, and people from all walks of life can understand the essence.

To illustrate, I leave you with the “Tristan and Isolde” from Richard Wagner. Note how at 1:35, Wagner describes the relationship between the knight and his maiden. The passionate heights of love are perfectly expressed: we hear two lovers, crashing into the arms of one another. And they are lost in the unfolding waves of bliss…

See Related Article: Song Review: “On the Turning Away” by Pink Floyd

Why is the US Putting Its Embassy in Jerusalem?

Why is the US Putting Its Embassy in Jerusalem?

The United States will move its embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. To the casual American, it’s a confusing decision. He thinks, “What’s going on over there?” or “Is Donald Trump crazy?” For what it’s worth, I have been to Jerusalem several times. So the Major will throw his two cents into the cup…

But first, a brief review of history is needed:

Jerusalem is the spiritual center of the Western world. It’s the home of Jesus, Mohammed and the Jews. And for thousands of years, the most powerful nation of its respective era was in control of the city. For example, when the Romans were in power, they ruled over Jerusalem. When the Turks gained control, they took over the city. And after World War 1, Jerusalem was given to the British – the most powerful European nation after the Great War.

roman is isreal
The most powerful nation in the world has always controlled Jerusalem: the Persians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Turks, etc.

Long story shot…Jerusalem is a prize that’s given to the most powerful nation of the Western world. Think of it as a trophy, handed over to the winner of a particular century.

Therefore…

The United States has been the most powerful nation in the Western World since World War 2. Therefore, the “baton” of Jerusalem should go to them.

President Trump realizes this fact, and he is placing the United States into its rightful place in world history. He’s doing what he knows is right, despite the anger of his detractors. Note that there are two important things to remember about his decision, since many people will view the move as an “invasion” or a type of “foreign intervention”:

1.) Jerusalem is in Israel. However, the security of Israel is based on its alliance to the United States. If Israel was only supported by Haiti, for example, it would no longer exist. It would have been wiped out by its hostile neighbors. Therefore, Israel can only exist with the support of the United States.

usisreal
Without US support, Israel would be in serious danger from its neighbors.

2.) The Palestinians are, generally speaking, a barbaric culture. They don’t deserve to be given a trophy that is, historically, only awarded to the pinnacle civilization of an era. It would like giving the Nobel Prize to a misbehaving child. Liberals that continually empathize with Palestinians would, if given the chance, live as far away from them as possible.

.
Should the Palestinians be in control of the most important city in the world? That’s like asking if an El Salvadorean street gang should run Wall Street.

Summary: President Trump has an incredible pair of stones. Moreover, he has a solid understanding of history and the place of the United States in this unfolding drama.  More importantly, he refuses to let America live in fear of the Palestinians.

See Related Article: Why Liberals are Unable to Acknowledge Islamic Terrorism

 

A Lesson on Role Models From Pliny the Younger

A Lesson on Role Models From Pliny the Younger

Pliny the Younger was a GREAT MAN of ancient Rome. And like all great men, he had a prolific role model that was inhabiting his spirit world: his uncle.

Pliny’s uncle was a busy statesman; yet in his spare time, the uncle manged to write the following works:

  • A treatise in one volume, “On the Use of the Dart by Cavalry”
  • Two volumes entitles “The Life of Pomponius Secundus”
  • Thirty-seven books on Natural History
  • Thirty books on the history of Aufidius Bassus
  • Twenty books on “The History of the Wars in Germany”
  • Eight Books entitled “Questions of Grammar and Style”
  • Six volumes of a work entitled “The Student,” on the attributes of successful oration

Pliny was in awe. He reflected on his uncle by stating the following:

It amuses me then when I hear myself called a studious man, who in comparison with him am the merest idler.

Summary: The role model is a man of high achievement. We stand in the shadow of his lofty ascension. He hovers atop a mountain, looking down on the mediocre masses. To stand beside him, we too must ascend! We must burn away the degenerate part of our self…the conscience of a humiliated half-man.

To be a GREAT MAN is painful; for it means that we must kill the drug dealer that hides in our soul: we must destroy the charlatan within.

Pliny had a GREAT MAN beside him: his uncle. But not everyone is so fortunate. The rest need to look for these men, wherever they may be…

See Related Article: The “Nice” Man is Not a Great Man

 

 

What Milo Yiannopolous Has to Say About Male Circumcision

What Milo Yiannopolous Has to Say About Male Circumcision

There was a recent debate on the Joe Rogan show. The topic of male circumcision came up and Milo Yiannopolous was critical of the foreskin. The reason? He prefers to fellate a circumcised penis.

I’m in favor of it purely on aesthetic grounds. I have to have these things in my mouth, Ok?

Good to know, Milo. I’ll make sure to cut my genitals with a knife in order to accommodate your fellatio preferences. You sick fuck.

Milo is a gay conservative Jew (yes, it’s true). And like many “modern” Jews, he refuses to eschew the practice of dick pruning. It’s like a monkey, clinging tightly to one’s back. Now it’s clear why Milo could never carry the torch of American conservatism in the post-Trump era (despite all of the attempts of Breitbart to hoist him into that position). His lifestyle is in direct opposition to that of traditional America.

So much has been said (and not said) on the topic of circumcision. The Major will defer to the opinion of Italian sociologist Paolo Mantegazzna. His direct statement in The Sexual Relations of Mankind (1935) summarizes my feelings to a tee:

I shout and shall continue to shout at the Hebrews, until my last breath: Cease mutilating yourself; cease imprinting upon your flesh an odious brand to distinguish yourself from other men (p. 99).

Here’s a bit of science for the disbelievers: The foreskin is homologous to the clitoral hood. Not analogous (similar to) but homologous (identical in structure). That’s a critical distinction. Therefore, male circumcision is equivalent to FGM in that they both remove the “clit” : a body part whose sole function is to give sexual pleasure. Or, to put it more plainly, circumcision is a procedure that’s designed to humiliate, denigrate and – ultimately – destroy the passion of an individual.

My son is sleeping sound at the moment. I refused to let some rapist in a white coat have at his genitals with a knife. Sorry, Milo…go look for a blowjob elsewhere!

See Related Article: How I Restored My Foreskin

 

 

When All Men Cannot be Free Alike and Happy All Men Must Suffer Alike as Slaves

When All Men Cannot be Free Alike and Happy All Men Must Suffer Alike as Slaves

Richard Wagner was more than a musical genius. He was an early practitioner of the red pill and a man that suffered no fools. One of his greatest bits of wisdom was on the political; in particular, on how ubiquitous ignorance can destroy a nation. Wagner points to the destruction of ancient Greece for an example:

“…the Barbarian needed only to subjugate the Greek: and all was over with Grecian freedom, strength, and beauty. Thus, in deep humiliation, two hundred million men, huddled in helpless confusion in the Roman empire, too soon found out that when all men cannot be free alike and happy all men must suffer alike as slaves.”

Summary: When the barbarians control a kingdom, then everybody lives in fear. By example, let’s reflect on the Library of Alexandria: a collection of nearly one million books, burned to the ground by savages. And the whole of Europe plunged into a sea of darkness. Imagine the insight in those books…the collected wisdom of the ages! And all was destroyed by a gang of grunting savages.

l of a
The ancient Library of Alexandria was burned to the ground by the invading barbarians.

Remember, my friends…

The barbarian can never respect or understand book of wisdom…to him, its pages are equivalent to a piece of toilet paper.

We see this today, of course, with the advent of unchecked immigration. America is no longer interested in bringing the “brightest and best” into the country. Instead, the traitorous lawmakers are using immigration to cause revolution. The same is occurring in London, Brussels and Munich. The missiles of destruction are not flying through the sky; they’re legislative in nature, occurring at weak border checkpoints and in the hands of corrupt officials.

I won’t belabor the point; other writers have addressed the immigration problem better than I. But it’s always interesting when you read history and a find an idea that correlates to the modern world. When we come across such things, we’re reminded that history repeats itself and that the past is alive in the present.

See Related Article: Richard Wagner on the Difference Between a True Artist and a Journeyman