The foreskin was meant to protect the highly innervated parts of the penis: i.e. inner foreskin, corona, glans, frenulum. Circumcision removes this protective covering, thus drying out and desensitizing the penis. This disturbs the natural state—the delicate balance between mind and body. It forces the circumcised man to view sex in a more cerebral way—you will even hear circumcised men say things like “sex is all in your head.”
The displacement of this natural balance explains, in part, the twisted psyche of the Jew. For 2,500 years, he has immorally butchered his own children. Then, these mutilated men grew to worship the only thing that could give them a power that would equate itself (however falsely) to a missing prepuce—money.
Foreskin restoration offers a solution to the American man who, via the naivete of his parents, was butchered in the Jewish style. It covers the keratinized tissue, allowing the dead skin to slough off. Then the faux skin tube rolls back and forth over the re-enervated tissue: i.e. inner foreskin, corona, etc.
The result is “rolling waves of pleasure.” These waves will, when the conditions are right, lead to uncontrollable bodily shaking: i.e. orgasm. And the climax is a profound ejaculation – think Wagner’s “Ride of the Valkyries” for a comparison.
The man that restores will reclaim a lot of the physical pleasure he was destined for. This act is, in many ways, the greatest revenge he can have against the Satanic practice of circumcision.
There was a recent debate on the Joe Rogan show. The topic of male circumcision came up and Milo Yiannopolous was critical of the foreskin. The reason? He prefers to fellate a circumcised penis.
I’m in favor of it purely on aesthetic grounds. I have to have these things in my mouth, Ok?
Good to know, Milo. I’ll make sure to cut my genitals with a knife in order to accommodate your fellatio preferences. You sick fuck.
Milo is a gay conservative Jew (yes, it’s true). And like many “modern” Jews, he refuses to eschew the practice of dick pruning. It’s like a monkey, clinging tightly to one’s back. Now it’s clear why Milo could never carry the torch of American conservatism in the post-Trump era (despite all of the attempts of Breitbart to hoist him into that position). His lifestyle is in direct opposition to that of traditional America.
So much has been said (and not said) on the topic of circumcision. The Major will defer to the opinion of Italian sociologist Paolo Mantegazzna. His direct statement in The Sexual Relations of Mankind (1935) summarizes my feelings to a tee:
I shout and shall continue to shout at the Hebrews, until my last breath: Cease mutilating yourself; cease imprinting upon your flesh an odious brand to distinguish yourself from other men (p. 99).
Here’s a bit of science for the disbelievers: The foreskin is homologous to the clitoral hood. Not analogous (similar to) but homologous (identical in structure). That’s a critical distinction. Therefore, male circumcision is equivalent to FGM in that they both remove the “clit” : a body part whose sole function is to give sexual pleasure. Or, to put it more plainly, circumcision is a procedure that’s designed to humiliate, denigrate and – ultimately – destroy the passion of an individual.
My son is sleeping sound at the moment. I refused to let some rapist in a white coat have at his genitals with a knife. Sorry, Milo…go look for a blowjob elsewhere!
See Related Article: How I Restored My Foreskin